Non-faith-based arguments against physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. The Linacre Quarterly, 83(3), 246-257. Argumentative Essay on Euthanasia Outline. Introduction. Thesis: Despite the argument put across by both sides of the debate, euthanasia is legally and morally wrong since it disregards the value of human life. Body. Paragraph One.
Non voluntary passive euthanasia. General Arguments: Against euthanasia: 1-One should not interfere in the doings of God: As God has a purpose to everything. Counter point: A person in favor of it usually says how one can be sure of what god wants or what god has in His mind. God has given us intellect to make one’s life as better as possible.
If death is not always seen to be the worst outcome, then many of the objections to euthanasia no longer exist, since many of the arguments rely on the notion that death cannot be a good outcome. People generally avoid death because they enjoy and value being alive, but in the case of a terminally ill patient, they may be in a lot of discomfort and pain, and are unable to enjoy their life.
Euthanasia is the ending of a person’s life to help the particular individual avoid pain and suffering that would have otherwise been inevitable if he or she had continued living. 2 In many countries, euthanasia is illegal. However, some countries allow euthanasia to be performed on individuals on their own consent or with the approval of a next of kin.
